Support animals bring the comfort of homes to dorms

At Miami University, some students have a different kind of roommate:  one that has a wet nose, a wagging tail and is always happy to see you.

Miami does not allow pets in residence halls, but some students this year are sharing their dorm rooms with an Emotional Support Animal, or ESA.

An ESA is an animal that helps to alleviate or lessen symptoms for a student with a mental or psychiatric disability, like anxiety or depression, as determined by a doctor or other medical professional.

Miami’s policy for admitting ESAs to residence halls states that the animals will be approved if “the student-owner clearly demonstrates the ESA is necessary to provide the student with an equal opportunity to use and enjoy the residence hall.”

According to Director of Student Disability Services Andrew Zeisler, there are currently eight ESAs living in Miami’s residence halls, including dogs, cats and a bearded dragon.

First-year Vivien Fierberg lives with her ESA, Cleo, to help with anxiety.  Cleo is a bearded dragon — a medium-sized lizard whose throat puffs out when it feels threatened, giving it its “beard.”

“I grew up on a farm, so I’ve always been around animals,” Fierberg said.  “When I decided to come here, it was important to me that I would be able to go back after school and still have an animal to hang out with.”

For Cleo to be permitted in the residence hall, Fierberg had to follow the process laid out by Student Disability Services.  A student who wants to register an ESA must provide written documentation from a healthcare professional, stating the student has a need for treatment of a mental or psychiatric disability and establishing the connection between that disability and the support the animal provides.

The student also has to provide a registration form and veterinary records for the animal.  After that, the student signs a policy that states they will pay for any damages or pest infestations the animal causes.

REST OF ARTICLE AT: http://miamistudent.net/?p=17012041

A Chicago restaurant has apologized after a military veteran was asked to leave the eatery because of his service dog

cochon+facebook

A Chicago restaurant has apologized after a military veteran was asked to leave the eatery because of his service dog.

Maj. Diggs Brown, a veteran of the Army Special Forces, said he and his service dog Arthur Barker Black were denied service at Cochon Volant in the city’s Loop, where they went for breakfast Saturday.

For the full story, visit the NBC website: http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/Chicago-Restaurant-Apologizes-After-Vet-Told-to-Leave-Because-of-Service-Dog-327463931.html#ixzz3m7cUYrIp

Invisible Disabilities: When is a dog a service dog? It can be hard to tell

Some have “no pet” policies, but if you walk in and see a person with a dog, don’t judge. The dog, like Jessica Hanaghan’s dog Noble, may be working.

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) defines a service animal as a dog (or a miniature horse) that has been specifically trained to do work or perform tasks for an individual with a physical or mental disability. The tasks performed by the dog must be directly related to the person’s disability.

According to the ADA, businesses that serve the public must allow service animals to accompany people with disabilities where the public is normally allowed to go despite any “no pets” policy. A person with a service dog may be asked to leave only if the dog misbehaves or is a danger.

Under California Penal Code 365.5, a business that interferes with a disabled person’s right to have a service dog with them in public places can be fined up to $2,500.

When California resident Jessica Hanaghan was diagnosed with an incurable auto-immune disorder back in 2013, she knew her life was going to be challenging and different, but she never imagined a service animal would be such as resourceful addition to her life.

Her condition causes pain and swelling of her joints, which results in muscle pain and body tremors (called flares). Flares weaken her body, making it difficult to walk or even pick up items.

“There is no treatment for my disorder, so I have to learn to cope with this for the rest of my life,” Hanaghan said. “When I was diagnosed, I began researching alternative treatments, and I started reading about service dogs. I talked about it with my doctor, who supported the idea and said she’d give me the recommendations I’d need to pursue getting a service dog.”

 

Noble, a 2-year-old Field Golden Retriever, was trained specifically to work with Hanaghan. Noble assits with:

  • Basic tasks such as picking up dropped items,
  • helping her keep balance as she walks,
  • pushing buttons to open automated doors, and
  • recognizing when Hanaghan is about to have a flare-up and gives her a special signal that alerts her to sit down and focus on relaxing.

“Noble and I are so in sync with each other,” Hanaghan said. “He’s been with me since November, and he’s changed my life. He can sense a flare-up before I even feel it, and sometimes I’m able to relax myself to where I don’t have tremors, and that makes such a difference. He’s improved my quality of life in so many ways.”

But not everything is easier with Noble! Being out in public has new challenges. Hanaghan said she’s experienced prejudice from business owners and patrons who ignore her rights to bring Noble with her to any public place, excluding churches as indicated in ADA regulations.

In July, she was turned away from a restaurant because the owner refused to allow Noble inside.

“The owner told me I could only be served on the patio,” Hanaghan said. “I’d never had problems at this restaurant before, but when the owner was there, he wouldn’t let me eat inside. I tried to explain that Noble is my service dog and I have the right to bring him with me, but he refused. It was embarrassing and demoralizing trying to explain my rights while they continued to serve other people.”

Pamela Cohen, an attorney with Disability Rights California, said that assuming Noble wasn’t displaying any aggressive behaviors, the restaurant did not have the right to refuse service. If she wants to, Hanaghan could file a formal claim with the U.S. Department of Justice.

Hanaghan said she doesn’t plan to file a formal claim against the local restaurant, but the incident has inspired her to educate people about service dogs. In her case, her disability is not always apparent and can be called an “invisible disability.”

“There is so much that people don’t know,” Hanaghan said. “You don’t have to be blind to need the assistance of a service dog, and trust me, I get asked if I’m blind a lot because most people don’t know that service dogs can be more than guide dogs.”

The ADA doesn’t require service dogs to have a special license or dog tag to identify them as a service dog.

“There is no training certification requirement for service animals under federal or state law,” Cohen said. “The only requirement is that a service animal must be individually trained to perform the disability-related tasks that it performs. The training can be done by the handler, a professional trainer, or anyone else. The trainer might give out a certificate, but it has no legal significance.

“Service dogs can be required to comply with vaccine and other local requirements for pets, but they do not need to be licensed or registered as service animals. A vest or tag might be helpful in identifying a dog as a service animal. However, it is not required, and it does not affect whether or not the dog qualifies as a service animal under the law.”

According to ADA requirements, businesses can ask a person with a service dog only two questions: Is the dog a service animal required because of a disability, and what are the tasks the dog is trained to perform?

“Under the law, I don’t have to discuss my disability, but that doesn’t stop people from trying,” Hanaghan said. “I carry a flyers in the pocket of Noble’s vest that explains ADA basics, but some people refuse to understand.”

Hanaghan said people stare at her, even if Noble keeps close to her while walking and sits or lays down if Hanaghan is seated. “Everywhere I go, I get looks. I hear the whispers. People think I’m doing it for attention, thinking I’m trying to get away with something. It’s disappointing.”

“A lot of people see him and want to come up to him and pet him, but he’s working,” Hanaghan said. “I rely on him, so I can’t have him distracted by people petting him and kids tugging on his tail. A lot of people are curious, and I love to take the extra time to educate people about the overall benefits of a service dog and what Noble means to me, but I understand some people are wary when they see a dog in a business. There are people who abuse the system. But I need Noble, and it’s disheartening when people expect me to explain myself all time.”

Today, Hanaghan and Noble are inseparable. He travels with her on airplanes and sits at her feet rather than travel in the cargo bay.

“The best compliment I’ve ever received is when a woman told me that she didn’t even know I had Noble with me,” Hanaghan said. “That means a lot. It’s always nice to get compliments about how well-behaved he is.”

HUD CHARGES LANDLORD WITH DISCRIMINATING AGAINST TENANT WITH DISABILITIES AND EMOTIONAL SUPPORT SERVICE ANIMAL

WASHINGTON – May 4, 2015 — The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) announced today that it is charging a Santa Fe, New Mexico landlord with housing discrimination for refusing to allow a renter with disabilities to keep her emotional support animal and to have her daughter reside with her. HUD’s charge further alleges that Paula Anderson threatened to evict the woman if she did not get rid of her support animal and have her daughter move out.  The woman’s daughter provided her with disability-related assistance.

The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful to refuse to make reasonable accommodations in policies or practices when a person with a disability requires such accommodations, including refusing to allow a live-in aide and refusing to grant waivers to “no-pet” policies for persons who require assistance or support animals. Additionally, the law makes it unlawful to make housing unavailable to any person because of a disability.

“Housing providers need to understand that support animals are not pets, they provide persons with disabilities the stability needed to perform life’s everyday activities,” said Gustavo Velasquez, HUD Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity.  “The Fair Housing Act requires housing providers to grant reasonable accommodations and HUD is committed to taking action if they fail to meet that obligation.”

The case came to HUD’s attention when the woman, who has a psychological disability, filed a complaint with HUD alleging that Anderson refused to allow her daughter to live with her, even though her daughter assists her with tasks made difficult by her disability.  Anderson also allegedly refused to allow the womanto keep an emotional support animal.  In addition, Anderson allegedly threatened to evict the woman unless both her daughter and the assistance animal moved out, despite the fact that the woman provided medical documentation verifying her condition and need for the assistance her daughter and support animal provided.

The woman ultimately had to move out in order to live with her daughter and support animal.

Read HUD’s charge against the New Mexico property owner.

HUD’s charge will be heard by a United States Administrative Law Judge unless any party to the charge elects to have the case heard in federal district court. If an administrative law judge finds after a hearing that discrimination has occurred, he may award damages to the woman for the harm caused her by the discrimination. The judge may also order injunctive relief and other equitable relief, as well as payment of attorney fees. In addition, the judge may impose fines to vindicate the public interest. If the matter is decided in federal court, the judge may also award punitive damages.

In FY 2014, disability was the most common basis of complaints filed with HUD and its partner agencies, being cited as a basis for 4,606 complaints, or 54 percent of the overall total.

Read HUD’s notice regarding service or companion animals.

Persons who believe they have experienced discrimination may file a complaint by contacting HUD’s Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity at (800) 669-9777 (voice) or (800) 927-9275 (TTY). Housing discrimination complaints may also be filed by going to www.hud.gov/fairhousing, or by downloading HUD’s free housing discrimination mobile application, which can be accessed through Apple devices, such as the iPhone, iPad, and iPod Touch.

###

HUD’s mission is to create strong, sustainable, inclusive communities and quality affordable homes for all.
More information about HUD and its programs is available on the Internet
at www.hud.gov and http://espanol.hud.gov.

Can a pit bull be an emotional support animal or service animal?

An Army veteran wants to move to Indiana once his military contract is over. Problem is: one member of his family isn’t welcome.

Wayne Tibbett has an emotional service animal named Zorro.

But Zorro is a pit bull and the communities Tibbett wants to move to prohibit owning that breed of dog.

More Than Man’s Best Friend

Elaine Stone is counting down the days until her daughter’s family comes home to the Hoosier state.

“I haven’t been close to my daughter for almost four years,” Stone says. “So, I can’t wait for my whole family to be together again.”

Her son-in-law Wayne Tibbett is stationed in New York and his military contract ends in May.

That’s when he plans to move his family back to Benton County, to the small town of Fowler or Oxford.

But both communities have ordinances that prohibit owning ‘vicious dogs’ –  specifically pit bulls.

The town of Oxford prohibits owning pit bulls.

That’s a problem for Tibbett because he has Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and his pit bull Zorro has become much more than a man’s best friend.

“When Wayne gets upset or nervous or anxious, like when he goes in big crowds or a lot of people or a lot of confusion, his anxiety kicks up,” Stone says. “And, he’ll go home and just be with the dog and the dog helps him out so much.”

Service Animal Vs. Emotional Support Animal

Zorro is considered an emotional support animal, which is different from a service animal.

“A trained service animal recognizes and then responds and serves to stop the individual from repetitive or harmful behaviors or gets them away from that particular environment by nuzzling the individual or whatever the animal has been trained to do,” says Peter Berg, Technical Assistance Coordinator at the Great Lakes ADA Center.

That distinction is important because while emotional support animals aren’t protected under the Americans with Disabilities Act, they are under the Fair Housing Act.

And Berg says that means Tibbett can bring Zorro to town.

A city or town may need to modify a housing ordinance that may limit a breed of dog that can reside in that town or that people can have in that town under the Fair Housing Act,” Berg says. “What gets confusing is that the town would only be required to modify as it relates to allowing the individual to have the animal in their home. The town wouldn’t have to allow the individual to then take the animal out in public.”

Shifting Away From Breed-Specific Legislation

Several of Indiana’s largest cities have moved away from breed-specific legislation – that includes Indianapolis, Fort Wayne and Bloomington.

The city of South Bend just changed its ordinance last year, shifting the language from being breed-specific to behavior-specific.

“Any dog can be aggressive if it’s unaltered, if it’s untrained, under socialized, unsupervised,” says South Bend Councilwoman Valerie Schey. “And, so, really good animal care and control law should be written to address those issues.”

Schey ran on a platform to update the city’s antiquated animal control laws.

She says since the new ordinance went into effect, there haven’t been any major issues.

And the animal shelter’s euthanasia rate has dropped 16 percent over the past two years.

“A lot of these wonderful dogs that happen to be pit bull mixes are now getting a chance to be a loving family companion,” Schey says. “And, that’s what means the most to me.”

Back in Oxford, Elaine Stone is waiting on paperwork from her son-in-law’s doctor so she can go before the town council and ask them to allow Zorro in town.

She just wants her family to come home – pit bull and all.

These vets have done so much for everybody. They have committed their lives to the military to protect us and this is how they’re treated?” Stone says. “It’s not fair. He just wants to come home and have a nice life. And, we’re finding so many problems.”

Town officials in Oxford and Fowler declined to comment for this story.

Judge rules that disabled passengers can sue Uber in discrimination lawsuit due to drivers refusing to accommodate service animals

Blind Californians accuse the ride-sharing company Uber of discriminating against disabled passengers with service dogs. A federal magistrate has reviewed teh evidence and will allow a lawsuit to move forward. One rights advocate says the ruling sets a precedent for holding technology companies like Uber accountable under civil rights laws.

In a decision made public in April of 2015, U.S. Magistrate Nathanael Cousins of San Francisco, California, said the National Federation of the Blind in California can proceed with a statewide suit on behalf of its members.

The lawsuit alleges that many Uber drivers refuse to take passengers with service animals. In one specific incident, the suit alleges, a driver agreed via the Uber system to pick up two men and take them to a destination, but when the driver arrived and saw a service dog, he shouted at the two passengers by stating “No dogs,” then cursed at the passengers, ignored an attempt at an explanation and sped away.

In March of 2014, the suit further alleges, an Uber driver picked up a blind woman in but then locked her service animal guide dog in the trunk of the car and ignored her pleas to release the animal until she was dropped off at her destination. Uber has also charged some disabled passengers cancellation fees after similar incidents, refunding those fees only after the passengers filed written complaints, the suit states.

Federal law requires taxis and other private transportation services, and arguably Uber drivers, to carry a disabled passenger’s service animal. Uber says that any driver who refuses to carry a service animal “will be deactivated from the Uber platform,” but the lawsuit makes it clear that there is an issue to investigate. The blind passengers and the advocacy group representing them say the company doesn’t appear to be enforcing those policies.

the judge ruled that an individual does not need to have suffered one of these incoidents to be able to sue, because even the knowledge of these incidents can affect a disabled person. For example, one of the individual plaintiffs, a Bay Area man who said the company’s practices deterred him, “does not need to use Uber’s services and risk being turned away when he has knowledge that disabled individuals with service animals have been turned away.”

Uber does have an argument for the court to consider that could prove a viable excuse for Uber’s actions, but only the lawsuit’s resolution will prove this justified or not: Uber argues that it is not a “public accommodation” covered by disability laws because it only enables would-be passengers to get rides yet does not itself provide transportation services. But the judge said the suit adequately alleged that the company was in the “travel service” business, regardless of whether Uber actually provided the rides itself.

The ruling will help to establish that “new technology companies like Uber are subject to the same … civil rights laws as other companies that have more traditional business models,” said Larry Paradis, executive director of the nonprofit Disability Rights Advocates, the organization which represents the plaintiffs.

“The Uber app is built to expand access to transportation options for all, including users with visual impairments and other disabilities,” the company Uber said in a statement. “It is Uber’s policy that driver partners are expected to comply with local, state and federal laws regarding the transportation of service animals, and we have consistently communicated this policy to drivers nationwide.”

Are your rights being violated? Here are the steps for filing violations with the appropriate government agencies

A Guide to Disability Rights Laws

U.S. Department of Justice

Civil Rights Division

Disability Rights Section


A Guide

to

Disability Rights Laws

 

 

 

July 2009


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Americans with Disabilities Act

 

Telecommunications Act

 

Fair Housing Act

 

Air Carrier Access Act

Voting Accessibility for the Elderly and Handicapped Act

 

National Voter Registration Act

Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act

 

Rehabilitation Act

 

Architectural Barriers Act

General Sources of Disability Rights Information

 

Statute Citations

 

 

For persons with disabilities, this document is available in large print, Braille, audio tape, and computer disk.

Reproduction of this document is encouraged.


 

 

This guide provides an overview of Federal civil rights laws that ensure equal opportunity for people with disabilities. To find out more about how these laws may apply to you, contact the agencies and organizations listed below.

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)

The ADA prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in employment, State and local government, public accommodations, commercial facilities, transportation, and telecommunications. It also applies to the United States Congress.

To be protected by the ADA, one must have a disability or have a relationship or association with an individual with a disability. An individual with a disability is defined by the ADA as a person who has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities, a person who has a history or record of such an impairment, or a person who is perceived by others as having such an impairment. The ADA does not specifically name all of the impairments that are covered.

ADA Title I: Employment

Title I requires employers with 15 or more employees to provide qualified individuals with disabilities an equal opportunity to benefit from the full range of employment-related opportunities available to others. For example, it prohibits discrimination in recruitment, hiring, promotions, training, pay, social activities, and other privileges of employment. It restricts questions that can be asked about an applicant’s disability before a job offer is made, and it requires that employers make reasonable accommodation to the known physical or mental limitations of otherwise qualified individuals with disabilities, unless it results in undue hardship. Religious entities with 15 or more employees are covered under title I.

Title I complaints must be filed with the U. S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) within 180 days of the date of discrimination, or 300 days if the charge is filed

with a designated State or local fair employment practice agency. Individuals may file a lawsuit in Federal court only after they receive a “right-to-sue” letter from the EEOC.

Charges of employment discrimination on the basis of disability may be filed at any U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission field office. Field offices are located in 50 cities throughout the U.S. and are listed in most telephone directories under “U.S. Government.” For the appropriate EEOC field office in your geographic area, contact:

(800) 669-4000 (voice)

(800) 669-6820 (TTY)

www.eeoc.gov

Publications and information on EEOC-enforced laws may be obtained by calling:

(800) 669-3362 (voice)

(800) 800-3302 (TTY)

For information on how to accommodate a specific individual with a disability, contact the Job Accommodation Network at:

(800) 526-7234 (voice)

(800) 781-9403 (TTY)

http://askjan.org

 

ADA Title II: State and Local Government Activities

Title II covers all activities of State and local governments regardless of the government entity’s size or receipt of Federal funding. Title II requires that State and local governments give people with disabilities an equal opportunity to benefit from all of their programs, services, and activities (e.g. public education, employment, transportation, recreation, health care, social services, courts, voting, and town meetings).

State and local governments are required to follow specific architectural standards in the new construction and alteration of their buildings. They also must relocate programs or otherwise provide access in inaccessible older buildings, and communicate effectively with people who have hearing, vision, or speech disabilities. Public entities are not required to take actions that would result in undue financial and administrative burdens. They are required to make reasonable modifications to policies, practices, and procedures where necessary to avoid discrimination, unless they can demonstrate that doing so would fundamentally alter the nature of the service, program, or activity being provided.

Complaints of title II violations may be filed with the Department of Justice within 180 days of the date of discrimination. In certain situations, cases may be referred to a mediation program sponsored by the Department. The Department may bring a lawsuit where it has investigated a matter and has been unable to resolve violations. For more information, contact:

U.S. Department of Justice

Civil Rights Division
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Disability Rights Section – NYAV

Washington, D.C. 20530

www.ada.gov

(800) 514-0301 (voice)

(800) 514-0383 (TTY)

Title II may also be enforced through private lawsuits in Federal court. It is not necessary to file a complaint with the Department of Justice (DOJ) or any other Federal agency, or to receive a “right-to-sue” letter, before going to court.

 

ADA Title II: Public Transportation

The transportation provisions of title II cover public transportation services, such as city buses and public rail transit (e.g. subways, commuter rails, Amtrak). Public transportation authorities may not discriminate against people with disabilities in the provision of their services. They must comply with requirements for accessibility in newly purchased vehicles, make good faith efforts to purchase or lease accessible used buses, remanufacture buses in an accessible manner, and, unless it would result in an undue burden, provide paratransit where they operate fixed-route bus or rail systems. Paratransit is a service where individuals who are unable to use the regular transit system independently (because of a physical or mental impairment) are picked up and dropped off at their destinations. Questions and complaints about public transportation should be directed to:

Office of Civil Rights

Federal Transit Administration

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, Room E54-427

Room 9102

Washington, D.C. 20590

www.fta.dot.gov/ada

(888) 446-4511 (voice/relay)

 

ADA Title III: Public Accommodations

Title III covers businesses and nonprofit service providers that are public accommodations, privately operated entities offering certain types of courses and examinations, privately operated transportation, and commercial facilities. Public accommodations are private entities who own, lease, lease to, or operate facilities such as restaurants, retail stores, hotels, movie theaters, private schools, convention centers, doctors’ offices, homeless shelters, transportation depots, zoos, funeral homes, day care centers, and recreation facilities including sports stadiums and fitness clubs. Transportation services provided by private entities are also covered by title III.

Public accommodations must comply with basic nondiscrimination requirements that prohibit exclusion, segregation, and unequal treatment. They also must comply with specific requirements related to architectural standards for new and altered buildings; reasonable modifications to policies, practices, and procedures; effective communication with people with hearing, vision, or speech disabilities; and other access requirements. Additionally, public accommodations must remove barriers in existing buildings where it is easy to do so without much difficulty or expense, given the public accommodation’s resources.

Courses and examinations related to professional, educational, or trade-related applications, licensing, certifications, or credentialing must be provided in a place and manner accessible to people with disabilities, or alternative accessible arrangements must be offered.

Commercial facilities, such as factories and warehouses, must comply with the ADA’s architectural standards for new construction and alterations.

Complaints of title III violations may be filed with the Department of Justice. In certain situations, cases may be referred to a mediation program sponsored by the Department. The Department is authorized to bring a lawsuit where there is a pattern or practice of discrimination in violation of title III, or where an act of discrimination raises an issue of general public importance. Title III may also be enforced through private lawsuits. It is not necessary to file a complaint with the Department of Justice (or any Federal agency), or to receive a “right-to-sue” letter, before going to court. For more information, contact:

U.S. Department of Justice

Civil Rights Division
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Disability Rights Section – NYAV

Washington, D.C. 20530

www.ada.gov

(800) 514-0301 (voice)

(800) 514-0383 (TTY)

 

ADA Title IV: Telecommunications Relay Services

Title IV addresses telephone and television access for people with hearing and speech disabilities. It requires common carriers (telephone companies) to establish interstate and intrastate telecommunications relay services (TRS) 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. TRS enables callers with hearing and speech disabilities who use TTYs (also known as TDDs), and callers who use voice telephones to communicate with each other through a third party communications assistant. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has set minimum standards for TRS services. Title IV also requires closed captioning of Federally funded public service announcements. For more information about TRS, contact the FCC at:

Federal Communications Commission

445 12th Street, S.W.

Washington, D.C. 20554

www.fcc.gov/cgb/dro

(888) 225-5322 (Voice)

(888) 835-5322 (TTY)

 

Telecommunications Act

Section 255 and Section 251(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, require manufacturers of telecommunications equipment and providers of telecommunications services to ensure that such equipment and services are accessible to and usable by persons with disabilities, if readily achievable. These amendments ensure that people with disabilities will have access to a broad range of products and services such as telephones, cell phones, pagers, call-waiting, and operator services, that were often inaccessible to many users with disabilities. For more information, contact:

Federal Communications Commission

445 12th Street, S.W.

Washington, D.C. 20554

www.fcc.gov/cgb/dro

(888) 225-5322 (Voice)

(888) 835-5322 (TTY)

 

Fair Housing Act

The Fair Housing Act, as amended in 1988, prohibits housing discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status, and national origin. Its coverage includes private housing, housing that receives Federal financial assistance, and State and local government housing. It is unlawful to discriminate in any aspect of selling or renting housing or to deny a dwelling to a buyer or renter because of the disability of that individual, an individual associated with the buyer or renter, or an individual who intends to live in the residence. Other covered activities include, for example, financing, zoning practices, new construction design, and advertising.

The Fair Housing Act requires owners of housing facilities to make reasonable exceptions in their policies and operations to afford people with disabilities equal housing opportunities. For example, a landlord with a “no pets” policy may be required to grant an exception to this rule and allow an individual who is blind to keep a guide dog in the residence. The Fair Housing Act also requires landlords to allow tenants with disabilities to make reasonable access-related modifications to their private living space, as well as to common use spaces. (The landlord is not required to pay for the changes.) The Act further requires that new multifamily housing with four or more units be designed and built to allow access for persons with disabilities. This includes accessible common use areas, doors that are wide enough for wheelchairs, kitchens and bathrooms that allow a person using a wheelchair to maneuver, and other adaptable features within the units.

Complaints of Fair Housing Act violations may be filed with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. For more information or to file a complaint, contact:

Office of Compliance and Disability Rights Division

Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

451 7th Street, S.W. , Room 5242

Washington, D.C. 20410

www.hud.gov/offices/fheo

(800) 669-9777 (voice)

(800) 927-9275 (TTY)

For questions about the accessibility provisions of the Fair Housing Act, contact Fair Housing FIRST at:

www.fairhousingfirst.org

(888) 341-7781 (voice/TTY)

For publications, you may call the Housing and Urban Development Customer Service Center at:

(800) 767-7468 (voice/relay)

Additionally, the Department of Justice can file cases involving a pattern or practice of discrimination. The Fair Housing Act may also be enforced through private lawsuits.

 

Air Carrier Access Act

The Air Carrier Access Act prohibits discrimination in air transportation by domestic and foreign air carriers against qualified individuals with physical or mental impairments. It applies only to air carriers that provide regularly scheduled services for hire to the public. Requirements address a wide range of issues including boarding assistance and certain accessibility features in newly built aircraft and new or altered airport facilities. People may enforce rights under the Air Carrier Access Act by filing a complaint with the U.S. Department of Transportation, or by bringing a lawsuit in Federal court. For more information or to file a complaint, contact:

Aviation Consumer Protection Division, C-75

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

http://airconsumer.ost.dot.gov

(202) 366-2220 (voice)

(202) 366-0511 (TTY)

(800) 778-4838 (voice)

(800) 455-9880 (TTY)

 

Voting Accessibility for the Elderly and Handicapped Act

The Voting Accessibility for the Elderly and Handicapped Act of 1984 generally requires polling places across the United States to be physically accessible to people with disabilities for federal elections. Where no accessible location is available to serve as a polling place, a political subdivision must provide an alternate means of casting a ballot on the day of the election. This law also requires states to make available registration and voting aids for disabled and elderly voters, including information by TTYs (also known as TDDs) or similar devices. For more information, contact:

U.S. Department of Justice

Civil Rights Division
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Voting Section – 1800 G

Washington, D.C. 20530

(800) 253-3931 (voice/TTY)

 

National Voter Registration Act

The National Voter Registration Act of 1993, also known as the “Motor Voter Act,” makes it easier for all Americans to exercise their fundamental right to vote. One of the basic purposes of the Act is to increase the historically low registration rates of minorities and persons with disabilities that have resulted from discrimination. The Motor Voter Act requires all offices of State-funded programs that are primarily engaged in providing services to persons with disabilities to provide all program applicants with voter registration forms, to assist them in completing the forms, and to transmit completed forms to the appropriate State official. For more information, contact:

U.S. Department of Justice

Civil Rights Division
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Voting Section – 1800 G

Washington, D.C. 20530

www.usdoj.gov/crt/voting

(800) 253-3931 (voice/TTY)

 

Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act

The Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act (CRIPA) authorizes the U.S. Attorney General to investigate conditions of confinement at State and local government institutions such as prisons, jails, pretrial detention centers, juvenile correctional facilities, publicly operated nursing homes, and institutions for people with psychiatric or developmental disabilities. Its purpose is to allow the Attorney General to uncover and correct widespread deficiencies that seriously jeopardize the health and safety of residents of institutions. The Attorney General does not have authority under CRIPA to investigate isolated incidents or to represent individual institutionalized persons.

The Attorney General may initiate civil law suits where there is reasonable cause to believe that conditions are “egregious or flagrant,” that they are subjecting residents to “grievous harm,” and that they are part of a “pattern or practice” of resistance to residents’ full enjoyment of constitutional or Federal rights, including title II of the ADA and section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. For more information or to bring a matter to the Department of Justice’s attention, contact:

U.S. Department of Justice

Civil Rights Division
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Special Litigation Section – PHB

Washington, D.C. 20530

www.usdoj.gov/crt/split

(877) 218-5228 (voice/TTY)

 

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (formerly called P.L. 94-142 or the Education for all Handicapped Children Act of 1975) requires public schools to make available to all eligible children with disabilities a free appropriate public education in the least restrictive environment appropriate to their individual needs.

IDEA requires public school systems to develop appropriate Individualized Education Programs (IEP’s) for each child. The specific special education and related services outlined in each IEP reflect the individualized needs of each student.

IDEA also mandates that particular procedures be followed in the development of the IEP. Each student’s IEP must be developed by a team of knowledgeable persons and must be at least reviewed annually. The team includes the child’s teacher; the parents, subject to certain limited exceptions; the child, if determined appropriate; an agency representative who is qualified to provide or supervise the provision of special education; and other individuals at the parents’ or agency’s discretion.

If parents disagree with the proposed IEP, they can request a due process hearing and a review from the State educational agency if applicable in that state. They also can appeal the State agency’s decision to State or Federal court. For more information, contact:

Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services

U.S. Department of Education
400 Maryland Avenue, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20202-7100

www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/osers/osep

(202) 245-7468 (voice/TTY)

 

Rehabilitation Act

The Rehabilitation Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in programs conducted by Federal agencies, in programs receiving Federal financial assistance, in Federal employment, and in the employment practices of Federal contractors. The standards for determining employment discrimination under the Rehabilitation Act are the same as those used in title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Section 501

Section 501 requires affirmative action and nondiscrimination in employment by Federal agencies of the executive branch. To obtain more information or to file a complaint, employees should contact their agency’s Equal Employment Opportunity Office.

Section 503

Section 503 requires affirmative action and prohibits employment discrimination by Federal government contractors and subcontractors with contracts of more than $10,000. For more information on section 503, contact:

Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs

U.S. Department of Labor
200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Room C-3325

Washington, D.C. 20210

www.dol.gov/ofccp/index.htm

(202) 693-0106 (voice/relay)

Section 504

Section 504 states that “no qualified individual with a disability in the United States shall be excluded from, denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under” any program or activity that either receives Federal financial assistance or is conducted by any Executive agency or the United States Postal Service.

Each Federal agency has its own set of section 504 regulations that apply to its own programs. Agencies that provide Federal financial assistance also have section 504 regulations covering entities that receive Federal aid. Requirements common to these regulations include reasonable accommodation for employees with disabilities; program accessibility; effective communication with people who have hearing or vision disabilities; and accessible new construction and alterations. Each agency is responsible for enforcing its own regulations. Section 504 may also be enforced through private lawsuits. It is not necessary to file a complaint with a Federal agency or to receive a “right-to-sue” letter before going to court.

For information on how to file 504 complaints with the appropriate agency, contact:

U.S. Department of Justice

Civil Rights Division
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Disability Rights Section – NYAV

Washington, D.C. 20530

www.ada.gov

(800) 514-0301 (voice)

(800) 514-0383 (TTY)

Section 508

Section 508 establishes requirements for electronic and information technology developed, maintained, procured, or used by the Federal government. Section 508 requires Federal electronic and information technology to be accessible to people with disabilities, including employees and members of the public.

An accessible information technology system is one that can be operated in a variety of ways and does not rely on a single sense or ability of the user. For example, a system that provides output only in visual format may not be accessible to people with visual impairments and a system that provides output only in audio format may not be accessible to people who are deaf or hard of hearing. Some individuals with disabilities may need accessibility-related software or peripheral devices in order to use systems that comply with Section 508. For more information on section 508, contact:

U.S. General Services Administration

Office of Government-wide Policy IT Accessiblity & Workflow Division (ITAW)

1800 F Street, N.W.

Room 2222 – MEC:ITAW

Washington, DC 20405-0001

www.gsa.gov/portal/content/105254

(202) 501-4906 (voice)

U.S. Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board

1331 F Street, N.W., Suite 1000

Washington, DC 20004-1111

www.access-board.gov

800-872-2253 (voice)

800-993-2822 (TTY)

 

Architectural Barriers Act

The Architectural Barriers Act (ABA) requires that buildings and facilities that are designed, constructed, or altered with Federal funds, or leased by a Federal agency, comply with Federal standards for physical accessibility. ABA requirements are limited to architectural standards in new and altered buildings and in newly leased facilities. They do not address the activities conducted in those buildings and facilities. Facilities of the U.S. Postal Service are covered by the ABA. For more information or to file a complaint, contact:

U.S. Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board

1331 F Street, N.W., Suite 1000

Washington, D.C. 20004-1111

www.access-board.gov

(800) 872-2253 (voice)

(800) 993-2822 (TTY)

 

General Sources of Disability Rights Information

ADA Information Line

(800) 514-0301 (voice)

(800) 514-0383 (TTY)

www.ada.gov

Regional Disability and Business

Technical Assistance Centers

(800) 949-4232 (voice/TTY)

 

www.adata.org

 

Statute Citations

Air Carrier Access Act of 1986

49 U.S.C. § 41705

Implementing Regulation:

14 CFR Part 382

Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990

42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq.

Implementing Regulations:

29 CFR Parts 1630, 1602 (Title I, EEOC)

28 CFR Part 35 (Title II, Department of Justice)

49 CFR Parts 27, 37, 38 (Title II, III, Department of Transportation)

28 CFR Part 36 (Title III, Department of Justice)

47 CFR §§ 64.601 et seq. (Title IV, FCC)

Architectural Barriers Act of 1968

42 U.S.C. §§ 4151 et seq.

Implementing Regulation:

41 CFR Subpart 101-19.6

Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act

42 U.S.C. §§ 1997 et seq.

Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988

42 U.S.C. §§ 3601 et seq.

Implementing Regulation:

24 CFR Parts 100 et seq.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act

20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq.

Implementing Regulation:

34 CFR Part 300

National Voter Registration Act of 1993

42 U.S.C. §§ 1973gg et seq.

Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended

29 U.S.C. § 791

Implementing Regulation:

29 CFR § 1614.203

Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended

29 U.S.C. § 793

Implementing Regulation:

41 CFR Part 60-741

Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended

29 U.S.C. § 794

Over 20 Implementing Regulations for federally assisted programs, including:

34 CFR Part 104 (Department of Education)

45 CFR Part 84 (Department of Health and Human Services)

28 CFR §§ 42.501 et seq.

Over 95 Implementing Regulations for federally conducted programs, including:

28 CFR Part 39 (Department of Justice)

Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended

29 U.S.C. § 794d

Telecommunications Act of 1996

47 U.S.C. §§ 255, 251(a)(2)

Voting Accessibility for the Elderly and Handicapped Act of 1984

42 U.S.C. §§ 1973ee et seq.

 

 

April 9, 2012

 

 

AIRLINE RULES – POLICY GUIDANCE CONCERNING SERVICE ANIMALS IN AIR TRANSPORTATION

(READ BELOW, OR DOWNLOAD FILE AT: DOT Guidelines)

4910-62-P

68 FR 24875, May 9, 2003

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

14 CFR Part 382

Docket No. OST-2003-15072

Guidance Concerning Service Animals in Air Transportation

AGENCY: Department of Transportation, Office of the Secretary.

ACTION: Guidance Concerning Service Animals in Air Transportation.

SUMMARY: This notice publishes a revision to the Department of Transportation’s Guidance Concerning Service Animals in Air Transportation, originally published in the Federal Register on November 1, 1996 (61 FR 56409, 56420).  It is the result of the Department’s review of a September 19, 2002, submission of suggested improvements to the existing guidance from representatives of the disability community and the airline industry.

ADDRESSES: This guidance document is available on the Department’s Web site at http://airconsumer.ost.dot.gov/ and future updates or revisions will be posted there.  Questions regarding this notice may be addressed to the Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings, C-70, 400 7th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Damon P. Whitehead, Office of the General Counsel, Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings, 400 Seventh Street, SW, Washington, DC 20590; (202) 366-1743; fax: (202) 366-7152; E-mail: damon.whitehead@ost.dot.gov.

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, DC

______________________________________________________________________________

POLICY GUIDANCE CONCERNING SERVICE ANIMALS IN AIR TRANSPORTATION

______________________________________________________________________________

In 1990, the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) promulgated the official regulations implementing the Air Carrier Access Act (ACAA).  Those rules are entitled Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability in Air Travel (14 CFR Part 382).  Since then the number of people with disabilities traveling by air has grown steadily.  This growth has increased the demand for air transportation accessible to all people with disabilities and the importance of understanding DOT’s regulations and how to apply them.  This document expands on an earlier DOT guidance document published in 1996[1], which was based on an earlier Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) service animal guide issued by the Department of Justice (DOJ) in July 1996.  The purpose of this document is to aid airline employees and people with disabilities in understanding and applying the ACAA and the provisions of Part 382 with respect to service animals in determining:

(1)  whether an animal is a service animal and its user a qualified individual with a disability;

(2)  how to accommodate a qualified person with a disability with a service animal in the aircraft cabin; and

(3)  when a service animal legally can be refused carriage in the cabin.

 

Background

The 1996 DOT guidance document defines a service animal as “any guide dog, signal dog, or other animal individually trained to provide assistance to an individual with a disability.  If the animal meets this definition, it is considered a service animal regardless of whether it has been licensed or certified by a state or local government.”  This document refines DOT’s previous definition of service animal[2] by making it clear that animals that assist persons with disabilities by providing emotional support qualify as service animals and ensuring that, in situations concerning emotional support animals, the authority of airline personnel to require documentation of the individual’s disability and the medical necessity of the passenger traveling with the animal is understood.

Today, both the general public and people with disabilities use many different terms to identify animals that can meet the legal definition of “service animal.”  These range from umbrella terms such as “assistance animal” to specific labels such as “hearing,” “signal,” “seizure alert,” “psychiatric service,” “emotional support” animal, etc. that describe how the animal assists a person with a disability.

When Part 382 was promulgated, most service animals were guide or hearing dogs.  Since then, a wider variety of animals (e.g., cats, monkeys, etc.) have been individually trained to assist people with disabilities.  Service animals also perform a much wider variety of functions than ever before (e.g., alerting a person with epilepsy of imminent seizure onset, pulling a wheelchair, assisting persons with mobility impairments with balance).  These developments can make it difficult for airline employees to distinguish service animals from pets, especially when a passenger does not appear to be disabled, or the animal has no obvious indicators that it is a service animal.  Passengers may claim that their animals are service animals at times to get around airline policies that restrict the carriage of pets.  Clear guidelines are needed to assist airline personnel and people with disabilities in knowing what to expect and what to do when these assessments are made.

Since airlines also are obliged to provide all accommodations in accordance with FAA safety regulations (see section 382.3(d)), educated consumers help assure that airlines provide accommodations consistent with the carriers’ safety duties and responsibilities.  Educated consumers also assist the airline in providing them the services they want, including accommodations, as quickly and efficiently as possible.

General Requirements of Part 382

In a nutshell, the main requirements of Part 382 regarding service animals are:

  • Carriers shall permit dogs and other service animals used by persons with disabilities to accompany the persons on a flight.  See section 382.55(a)(1-2).
    • Carriers shall accept as evidence that an animal is a service animal identifiers such as identification cards, other written documentation, presence of harnesses, tags or the credible verbal assurances of a qualified individual with a disability using the animal.
    • Carriers shall permit a service animal to accompany a qualified individual with a disability in any seat in which the person sits, unless the animal obstructs an aisle or other area that must remain unobstructed in order to facilitate an emergency evacuation or to comply with FAA regulations.
      • If a service animal cannot be accommodated at the seat location of the qualified individual with a disability whom the animal is accompanying, the carrier shall offer the passenger the opportunity to move with the animal to a seat location in the same class of service, if present on the aircraft, where the animal can be accommodated, as an alternative to requiring that the animal travel in the cargo hold (see section 382.37(c)).
      • Carriers shall not impose charges for providing facilities, equipment, or services that are required by this part to be provided to qualified individuals with a disability (see section 382.57).

Two Steps for Airline Personnel

To determine whether an animal is a service animal and should be allowed to accompany its user in the cabin, airline personnel should:

  1. Establish whether the animal is a pet or a service animal, and whether the passenger is a qualified individual with a disability; and then
  2. Determine if the service animal presents either
  • a “direct threat to the health or safety of others,” or
  • a significant threat of disruption to the airline service in the cabin (i.e. a “fundamental alteration” to passenger service).  See 382.7(c).

Service Animals

How do I know it’s a service animal and not a pet?

Remember:  In most situations the key is TRAINING.  Generally, a service animal is individually trained to perform functions to assist the passenger who is a qualified individual with a disability.  In a few extremely limited situations, an animal such as a seizure alert animal may be capable of performing functions to assist a qualified person with a disability without individualized training.  Also, an animal used for emotional support need not have specific training for that function.  Similar to an animal that has been individually trained, the definition of a service animal includes:

an animal that has been shown to have the innate ability to assist a person with a disability; or

an emotional support animal.

These five steps can help one determine whether an animal is a service animal or a pet:

  1. Obtain credible verbal assurances: Ask the passenger: “Is this your pet?”  If the passenger responds that the animal is a service animal and not a pet, but uncertainty remains about the animal, appropriate follow-up questions would include:
  • “What tasks or functions does your animal perform for you?” or
  • “What has it been trained to do for you?”
  • “Would you describe how the animal performs this task (or function) for you?”
  • As noted earlier, functions include, but are not limited to:

A.             helping blind or visually impaired people to safely negotiate their surroundings;

B.            alerting deaf and hard-of-hearing persons to sounds;

C.            helping people with mobility impairments to open and close doors, retrieve objects, transfer from one seat to another, maintain balance; or

D.            alert or respond to a disability-related need or emergency (e.g., seizure, extreme social anxiety or panic attack).

  • Note that to be a service animal that can properly travel in the cabin, the animal need not necessarily perform a function for the passenger during the flight.  For example, some dogs are trained to help pull a passenger’s wheelchair or carry items that the passenger cannot readily carry while using his or her wheelchair.  It would not be appropriate to deny transportation in the cabin to such a dog.
  • If a passenger cannot provide credible assurances that an animal has been individually trained or is able to perform some task or function to assist the passenger with his or her disability, the animal might not be a service animal.  In this case, the airline personnel may require documentation (see Documentation below).
  • There may be cases in which a passenger with a disability has personally trained an animal to perform a specific function (e.g., seizure alert).  Such an animal may not have been trained through a formal training program (e.g., a “school” for service animals).  If the passenger can provide a reasonable explanation of how the animal was trained or how it performs the function for which it is being used, this can constitute a “credible verbal assurance” that the animal has been trained to perform a function for the passenger.
  1. Look for physical indicators on the animal: Some service animals wear harnesses, vests, capes or backpacks.  Markings on these items or on the animal’s tags may identify it as a service animal.  It should be noted, however, that the absence of such equipment does not necessarily mean the animal is not a service animal.
  2. Request documentation for service animals other than emotional support animals: The law allows airline personnel to ask for documentation as a means of verifying that the animal is a service animal, but DOT urges carriers not to require documentation as a condition for permitting an individual to travel with his or her service animal in the cabin unless a passenger’s verbal assurance is not credible.  In that case, the airline may require documentation as a condition for allowing the animal to travel in the cabin.  The purpose of documentation is to substantiate the passenger’s disability-related need for the animal’s accompaniment, which the airline may require as a condition to permit the animal to travel in the cabin.  Examples of documentation include a letter from a licensed professional treating the passenger’s condition (e.g., physician, mental health professional, vocational case manager, etc.)
  3. Require documentation for emotional support animals:  With respect to an animal used for emotional support (which need not have specific training for that function), airline personnel may require current documentation (i.e., not more than one year old) on letterhead from a mental health professional stating (1) that the passenger has a mental health-related disability; (2) that having the animal accompany the passenger is necessary to the passenger’s mental health or treatment or to assist the passenger (with his or her disability); and (3) that the individual providing the assessment of the passenger is a licensed mental health professional and the passenger is under his or her professional care.  Airline personnel may require this documentation as a condition of permitting the animal to accompany the passenger in the cabin.  The purpose of this provision is to prevent abuse by passengers that do not have a medical need for an emotional support animal and to ensure that passengers who have a legitimate need for emotional support animals are permitted to travel with their service animals on the aircraft.  Airlines are not permitted to require the documentation to specify the type of mental health disability, e.g., panic attacks.
  4. Observe behavior of animals:  Service animals are trained to behave properly in public settings.  For example, a properly trained guide dog will remain at its owner’s feet.  It does not run freely around an aircraft or an airport gate area, bark or growl repeatedly at other persons on the aircraft, bite or jump on people, or urinate or defecate in the cabin or gate area.  An animal that engages in such disruptive behavior shows that it has not been successfully trained to function as a service animal in public settings.  Therefore, airlines are not required to treat it as a service animal, even if the animal performs an assistive function for a passenger with a disability or is necessary for a passenger’s emotional well-being.

What about service animals in training?

Part 382 requires airlines to allow service animals to accompany their handlers[3] in the cabin of the aircraft, but airlines are not required otherwise to carry animals of any kind either in the cabin or in the cargo hold.  Airlines are free to adopt any policy they choose regarding the carriage of pets and other animals provided that they comply with other applicable requirements (e.g., the Animal Welfare Act).  Although “service animals in training” are not pets, the ACAA does not include them, because “in training” status indicates that they do not yet meet the legal definition of service animal.  However, like pet policies, airline policies regarding service animals in training vary.  Some airlines permit qualified trainers to bring service animals in training aboard an aircraft for training purposes.  Trainers of service animals should consult with airlines, and become familiar with their policies.

 

What about a service animal that is not accompanying a qualified individual with a disability?

When a service animal is not accompanying a passenger with a disability, the airline’s general policies on the carriage of animals usually apply.  Airline personnel should know their company’s policies on pets, service animals in training, and the carriage of animals generally.  Individuals planning to travel with a service animal other than their own should inquire about the applicable policies in advance.

Qualified Individuals with Disabilities[4]

How do I know if a passenger is a qualified individual with a disability who is entitled to bring a service animal in the cabin of the aircraft if the disability is not readily apparent?

  • Ask the passenger about his or her disability as it relates to the need for a service animal.  Once the passenger identifies the animal as a service animal, you may ask, “How does your animal assist you with your disability?”  Avoid the question “What is your disability?” as this implies you are asking for a medical label or the cause of the disability, which is intrusive and inconsistent with the intent of the ACAA.  Remember, Part 382 is intended to facilitate travel by people with disabilities by requiring airlines to accommodate them on an individual basis.
  • Ask the passenger whether he or she has documentation as a means of verifying the medical necessity of the passenger traveling with the animal.  Keep in mind that you can ask but cannot require documentation as proof of service animal status UNLESS (1) a passenger’s verbal assurance is not credible and the airline personnel cannot in good faith determine whether the animal is a service animal without documentation, or (2) a passenger indicates that the animal is to be used as an emotional support animal.
  • Using the questions and other factors above, you must decide whether it is reasonable to believe that the passenger is a qualified individual with a disability, and the animal is a service animal.

Denying a Service Animal Carriage in the Cabin

What do I do if I believe that carriage of the animal in the cabin of the aircraft would inconvenience non-disabled passengers?

Part 382 requires airlines to permit qualified individuals with a disability to be accompanied by their service animals in the cabin, as long as the animals do not 1) pose a direct threat to the health or safety of others (e.g., animal displays threatening behaviors by growling, snarling, lunging at, or attempting to bite other persons on the aircraft) or 2) cause a significant disruption in cabin service (i.e. a “fundamental alteration” to passenger service).  Inconvenience of other passengers is not sufficient grounds to deny a service animal carriage in the cabin; as indicated later in this document, however, airlines are not required to ask other passengers to relinquish space that they would normally use in order to accommodate a service animal (e.g., space under the seat in front of the non-disabled passenger).

What do I do if I believe that a passenger’s assertions about having a disability or a service animal are not credible?

  • Ask if the passenger has documentation that satisfies the requirements for determining that the animal is a service animal (see discussion of “Documentation” above).
    • If the passenger has no documents, then explain to the passenger that the animal cannot be carried in the cabin, because it does not meet the criteria for service animals. Explain your airline’s policy on pets (i.e., will or will not accept for carriage in the cabin or cargo hold), and what procedures to follow.
    • If the passenger does not accept your explanation, avoid getting into an argument.  Ask the passenger to wait while you contact your airline’s complaint resolution official (CRO).  Part 382 requires all airlines to have a CRO available at each airport they serve during all hours of operation.  The CRO may be made available by telephone.  The CRO is a resource for resolving difficulties related to disability accommodation.
    • Consult with the CRO immediately, if possible.  The CRO normally has the authority to make the final decision regarding carriage of service animals.  In the rare instance that a service animal would raise a concern regarding flight safety, the CRO may consult with the pilot-in-command.  If the pilot-in-command makes a decision to restrict the animal from the cabin or the flight for safety reasons, the CRO cannot countermand the pilot’s decision.  This does not preclude the Department from taking subsequent enforcement action, however, if it is determined that the pilot’s decision was inconsistent with Part 382.
    • If a passenger makes a complaint to a CRO about a past  decision not to accept an animal as a service animal, then the CRO must provide a written statement to the passenger within 10 days explaining the reason(s) for that determination.  If carrier personnel other than the CRO make the final decision, a written explanation is not required; however, because denying carriage of a legitimate service animal is a potential civil rights violation, it is recommended that carrier personnel explain to the passenger the reason the animal will not be accepted as a service animal.  A recommended practice may include sending passengers whose animals are not accepted as service animals a letter within ten business days explaining the basis for such a decision.


In considering whether a service animal should be excluded from the cabin, keep these things in mind:

  • Certain unusual service animals pose unavoidable safety and/or public health concerns and airlines are not required to transport them.  Snakes, other reptiles, ferrets, rodents, and spiders certainly fall within this category of animals.
    • In all other circumstances, each situation must be considered individually.  Do not make assumptions about how a particular unusual animal is likely to behave based on past experience with other animals.  You may inquire, however, about whether a particular animal has been trained to behave properly in a public setting.
    • Before deciding to exclude the animal, you should consider and try available means of mitigating the problem (e.g., muzzling a dog that barks frequently, allowing the passenger a reasonable amount of time under the circumstances to correct the disruptive behavior, offering the passenger a different seat where the animal won’t block the aisle.)

If it is determined that the animal should not accompany the disabled passenger in the cabin at this time, offer the passenger alternative accommodations in accordance with Part 382 and company policy (e.g., accept the animal for carriage in the cargo hold).

What about unusual service animals?

  • As indicated above, certain unusual service animals, pose unavoidable safety and/or public health concerns and airlines are not required to transport them.  Snakes, other reptiles, ferrets, rodents, and spiders certainly fall within this category of animals.  The release of such an animal in the aircraft cabin could result in a direct threat to the health or safety of passengers and crewmembers.  For these reasons, airlines are not required to transport these types of service animals in the cabin, and carriage in the cargo hold will be in accordance with company policies on the carriage of animals generally.
  • Other unusual animals such as miniature horses, pigs and monkeys should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.  Factors to consider are the animal’s size, weight, state and foreign country restrictions, and whether or not the animal would pose a direct threat to the health or safety of others, or cause a fundamental alteration (significant disruption) in the cabin service.  If none of these factors apply, the animal may accompany the passenger in the cabin.  In most other situations, the animal should be carried in the cargo hold in accordance with company policy.

Miscellaneous Questions

What about the passenger who has two or more service animals?

  • A single passenger legitimately may have two or more service animals.  In these circumstances, you should make every reasonable effort to accommodate them in the cabin in accordance with Part 382 and company policies on seating.  This might include permitting the passenger to purchase a second seat so that the animals can be accommodated in accordance with FAA safety regulations.  You may offer the passenger a seat on a later flight if the passenger and animals cannot be accommodated together at a single passenger seat.  Airlines may not charge passengers for accommodations that are required by Part 382, including transporting service animals in the cargo compartment.  If carriage in the cargo compartment is unavoidable, notify the destination station to return the service animal(s) to the passenger at the gate as soon as possible, or to assist the passenger as necessary to retrieve them in the appropriate location.

 

What if the service animal is too large to fit under the seat in front of the customer?

  • If the service animal does not fit in the assigned location, you should relocate the passenger and the service animal to some other place in the cabin in the same class of service where the animal will fit under the seat in front of the passenger and not create an obstruction, such as the bulkhead.  If no single seat in the cabin will accommodate the animal and passenger without causing an obstruction, you may offer the option of purchasing a second seat, traveling on a later flight or having the service animal travel in the cargo hold.  As indicated above, airlines may not charge passengers with disabilities for services required by Part 382, including transporting their oversized service animals in the cargo compartment.

Should passengers provide advance notice to the airline concerning multiple or large service animals?

In most cases, airlines may not insist on advance notice or health certificates for service animals under the ACAA regulations.  However, it is very useful for passengers to contact the airline well in advance if one or more of their service animals may need to be transported in the cargo compartment.  The passenger will need to understand airline policies and should find out what type of documents the carrier would need to ensure the safe passage of the service animal in the cargo compartment and any restrictions for cargo travel that might apply (e.g., temperature conditions that limit live animal transport).

What if an airline employee or another passenger on board is allergic or has an adverse reaction to a passenger’s service animal?

Passengers who state they have allergies or other animal aversions should be located as far away from the service animal as practicable.  Whether or not an individual’s allergies or animal aversions are disabilities (an issue this Guidance does not address), each individual’s needs should be addressed to the fullest extent possible under the circumstances and in accordance with the requirements of Part 382 and company policy.

Accommodating Passengers With Service Animals in the Cabin

How can airline personnel help ensure that passengers with service animals are assigned and obtain appropriate seats on the aircraft?

  • Let passengers know the airline’s policy about seat assignments for people with disabilities.  For instance:  (1) should the passenger request pre-boarding at the gate? or (2) should the passenger request an advance seat assignment (a priority seat such as a bulkhead seat or aisle seat) up to 24 hours before departure? or (3) should the passenger request an advance seat assignment at the gate on the day of departure?  When assigning priority seats, ask the passenger what location best fits his/her needs.
  • Passengers generally know what kinds of seats best suit their service animals.  In certain circumstances, passengers with service animals must either be provided their pre-requested priority seats, or if their requested seat location cannot be made available, they must be assigned to other available priority seats of their choice in the same cabin class.  Part 382.38 requires airlines to provide a bulkhead seat or a seat other than a bulkhead seat at the request of an individual traveling with a service animal.
  • Passengers should comply with airline recommendations or requirements regarding when they should arrive at the gate before a flight.  This may vary from airport to airport and airline to airline.  Not all airlines announce pre-boarding for passengers with special needs, although it may be available.  If you wish to request pre-boarding, tell the agent at the gate.
  • Unless pre-boarding is not part of your carrier’s business operation, a timely request for pre-boarding by a passenger with a disability should be honored (382.38 (d)).
  • Part 382 does not require carriers to make modifications that would constitute an undue burden or would fundamentally alter their programs (382.7 (c)).  Therefore, the following are not required in providing accommodations for users of service animals and are examples of what might realistically be viewed as creating an undue burden:
    • Asking another passenger to give up the space in front of his or her seat to accommodate a service animal;
    • Denying transportation to any individual on a flight in order to provide an accommodation to a passenger with a service animal;
    • Furnishing more than one seat per ticket; and
    • Providing a seat in a class of service other than the one the passenger has purchased.

Are airline personnel responsible for the care and feeding of service animals?

Airline personnel are not required to provide care, food, or special facilities for service animals.  The care and supervision of a service animal is solely the responsibility of the passenger with a disability whom the animal is accompanying.

May an air carrier charge a maintenance or cleaning fee to passengers who travel with service animals?

Part 382 prohibits air carriers from imposing special charges for accommodations required by the regulation, such as carriage of a service animal.  However, an air carrier may charge passengers with a disability if a service animal causes damage, as long as it is its regular practice to charge non-disabled passengers for similar kinds of damage.  For example, it could charge a passenger with a disability for the cost of repairing or cleaning a seat damaged by a service animal, assuming that it is its policy to charge when a non-disabled passenger or his or her pet causes similar damage.

Advice for Passengers with Service Animals

  • Ask about the airline’s policy on advance seat assignments for people with disabilities.  For instance:  (1) should a passenger request pre-boarding at the gate? or (2) should a passenger request an advance seat assignment (a priority seat such as a (bulkhead seat or aisle seat)) up to 24 hours before departure? or (3) should a passenger request an advance seat assignment at the gate on the day of departure?
  • Although airlines are not permitted to automatically require documentation for service animals other than emotional support animals, if you think it would help you explain the need for a service animal, you may want to carry documentation from your physician or other licensed professional confirming your need for the service animal.  Passengers with unusual service animals also may want to carry documentation confirming that their animal has been trained to perform a function or task for them.
  • If you need a specific seat assignment for yourself and your service animal, make your reservation as far in advance as you can, and identify your need at that time.
  • You may have to be flexible if your assigned seat unexpectedly turns out to be in an emergency exit row.  When an aircraft is changed at the last minute, seating may be reassigned automatically.  Automatic systems generally do not recognize special needs, and may make inappropriate seat assignments.  In that case, you may be required by FAA regulations to move to another seat.
  • Arrive at the gate when instructed by the airline, typically at least one hour before departure, and ask the gate agent for pre-boarding — if that is your desire.
  • Remember that your assigned seat may be reassigned if you fail to check in on time; airlines typically release seat assignments not claimed 30 minutes before scheduled departure.  In addition, if you fail to check in on time you may not be able to take advantage of the airline’s pre-board offer.
  • If you have a very large service animal or multiple animals that might need to be transported in the cargo compartment, contact the airline well in advance of your travel date.  In most cases, airlines cannot insist on advance notice or health certificates for service animals under the ACAA regulations.  However, it is very useful for passengers to contact the airline well in advance if one or more of their service animals may need to be transported in the cargo compartment.  The passenger will need to understand airline policies and should find out what type of documents the carrier would need to ensure the safe passage of the service animal in the cargo compartment and any restrictions for cargo travel that might apply (e.g., temperature conditions that limit live animal transport).
  • If you are having difficulty receiving an appropriate accommodation, ask the airline employee to contact the airline’s complaint resolution official (CRO).  Part 382 requires all airlines to have a CRO available during all hours of operation.  The CRO is a resource for resolving difficulties related to disability accommodations.
  • Another resource for resolving issues related to disability accommodations is the U.S. Department of Transportation’s aviation consumer disability hotline.  The toll-free number is 1-800-778-4838 (voice) and 1-800-455-9880 (TTY).

 

Glossary

Direct Threat to the Health or Safety of Others

A significant risk to the health or safety of others that cannot be eliminated by a modification of policies, practices, or procedures, or by the provision of auxiliary aids or services.

Fundamental Alteration

A modification that substantially alters the basic nature or purpose of a program, service, product or activity.

Individual with a Disability

“Any individual who has a physical or mental impairment that, on a permanent or temporary basis, substantially limits one or more major life activities, has a record of such an impairment, or is regarded as having such an impairment.”  (Section 382.5).

Qualified Individual with a Disability

Any individual with a disability who:

(1)  “takes those actions necessary to avail himself or herself of facilities or services offered by an air carrier to the general public with respect to accompanying or meeting a traveler, use of ground transportation, using terminal facilities, or obtaining information about schedules, fares or policies”;

(2)  “offers, or makes a good faith attempt to offer, to purchase or otherwise validly to obtain . . . a ticket” “for air transportation on an air carrier”; or

(3)  “purchases or possesses a valid ticket for air transportation on an air carrier and presents himself or herself at the airport for the purpose of traveling on the flight for which the ticket has been purchased or obtained; and meets reasonable, nondiscriminatory contract of carriage requirements applicable to all passengers.”  (Section 382.5).

Service Animal

Any animal that is individually trained or able to provide assistance to a qualified person with a disability; or any animal shown by documentation to be necessary for the emotional well being of a passenger.

Sources

See: 14 CFR 382.5, 14 CFR 382.37(a) and (c), 14 CFR 382.38 (a)(3), (b), (d) & (h)-(j), 14 CFR 382.55(a)(1)-(3), 14 CFR 382.57, “Guidance Concerning Service Animals in Air Transportation,” (61 FR 56420-56422, (November 1, 1996)), “Commonly Asked Questions About Service Animals in Places of Business” (Department of Justice, July, 1996), and “ADA Business Brief: Service Animals” (Department of Justice, April 2002).

Questions regarding this notice may be addressed to the Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings, C-70, 400 7th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20590.  A copy of this notice will be published in the Federal Register.

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at http://airconsumer.ost.dot.gov

Issued in Washington, DC on May 2, 2003.

 

 

 

 

Samuel Podberesky,

 

Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings

 



[1] 61 FR 56409, 56420 (Nov. 1, 1996).

 

[2] See Glossary for definition of this and other terms.

[3] Service animal users typically refer to the person who accompanies the animal as the “handler.”

[4] See Glossary.

Registered emotional support animal Oliver attends classes with student and sleeps in the residence halls

Linguistics freshman Kai Barclay sets a few alarms to get out of bed in the morning, but her most reliable alarm is her dog, Oliver.

With the morning light streaming in through the windows of Barclay’s dorm, Oliver, an excitable boxer mix, will crawl into her bed when he hears her first alarm go off. He’ll rest his head on her shoulder, and she’ll rest her eyes for a few more minutes. When he hears the second alarm, he’ll start to nudge her out from under the covers, so the two of them can get up, eat breakfast and head to class.

Where Barclay goes, so does Oliver. He’s registered as an emotional support animal, so he attends classes with Barclay and sleeps in the residence halls with her. Oliver is a source of comfort and support for Barclay, who deals with anxiety and depression.

“If I’m in class and he can tell I’m a little stressed, he can tell, and he’ll crawl up onto my lap — just his front paws — so I can hug him,” Barclay said. “He’s good at picking up on my emotions a lot of the time.”

She adopted Oliver from an animal shelter last November, after being particularly homesick and lonely for the first few months of her freshman year. She’d noticed that a friend, chemical biosciences freshman Beth Taylor, had a dog — aptly named Boomer — who lived with her in the dorms as an emotional support animal. Taylor guided Barclay through the process of registering Oliver as an emotional support animal to help her cope with anxiety.

Barclay and Taylor both went through the OU Disability Resource Center to ensure that their dogs could live with them in the residence halls.

According to the OU Disability Resource Center’s website, federal law allows students to keep an assistance animal in university housing if the student has a disability, the animal is necessary to give the student an equal opportunity to live in and enjoy university housing and there is a definitive correlation between the student’s disability and the assistance the animal provides.

With a health care provider’s documentation of the student’s disability and the assistance the animal provides, the student can keep an animal in the residence halls with them, so long as it’s not disruptive.

Unlike Barclay, Taylor’s only roommate is her dog. After registering with the OU Disability Resource Center, she received permission for the two to live in a single dorm in Walker tower. Taylor adopted Boomer from a shelter in Oklahoma City near the end of her senior year of high school. She doesn’t like to be alone, and Boomer can always be with her.

Though most people respond well to seeing Boomer, Taylor said that some people see him as an invitation to ask overly personal questions.

“There are people who walk up and pet my dog and say, ‘So, what’s your problem?’” Taylor said. “And I don’t know how to answer that.”

Boomer is on his way to being trained as a service dog. Taylor, who has epilepsy, wants to train him to warn her when she is about to have a seizure. Similarly, Barclay is training her dog, Oliver, as a psychiatric service animal.

Still, not all campuses are so welcoming to dogs like Oliver or Boomer.

Last Thursday, the University of Rhode Island’s student newspaper, The Good 5 Cent Cigar, published a lighthearted feature on one of the university’s janitors and his therapy dog, a husky named Ivy. This week, Ivy was ordered off campus by the university’s department of housing and residential life.

Ivy’s owner, Mike LaPolice, said that he was happy about the article at first — he was excited for more students to know about the positive effect therapy dogs like Ivy can have on college students. But when he was approached by university housing staff, and they demanded to take Ivy home and forgo the day’s pay on Thursday, LaPolice was shocked.

“I never thought this would happen,” LaPolice said in an interview with The Good 5 Cent Cigar.

University of Rhode Island students attested to Ivy’s calming effect. One student noted that Ivy seemed to sense when he was upset and comforted him.

Barclay said that while Oliver isn’t a therapy dog, her friends and peers often ask to pet Oliver and spend time with him when they’re stressed. Recognizing the therapeutic effect Oliver’s presence has on them, she always says yes.

For her, it’s simple.

“Dogs just make people happy,” Barclay said. “That’s pretty much their goal in life.”

Reposted with permission from: http://www.oudaily.com/news/two-ou-students-seek-comfort-through-emotional-support-animals/article_cd9991a0-e7cf-11e4-981c-1f64388ae245.html

Marine Veteran Holds Vigil for His Lost Therapy Dog

 

“Whenever there’s a dog missing it pulls at our hearts that a dog has gone away and we’re going to find that dog,” said Marianne Ponce, a volunteer helping search for Therapy Dog Nahla, who went missing.

Nahla’s reassuring smile helps her handler/owner Hernando Quandt manage his post-traumatic stress after serving four years in the military. The dog helps Quandt cope with his post-traumatic stress disorder from his time in the Marine Corps and without her he’s lost.

“We really miss her,” said Quandt. “She is an emotional support animal. I am a veteran of the Marine Corps. We didn’t get her for that reason, but we realized what a benefit she was.”

“It’s almost like she could sense when I’m kind of in the middle of one of these episodes and she’d lick me or come and make the physical contact she made with me (that) kind of pulled me back,” he said.

Nahla disappeared from the owner’s Chula Vista, CA home last December while the couple was out of town visiting a sick family member.

“…She’s not just a pet to us. If she was just a dog to us, we’d just go get another dog,” wife Vivian Quandt said.

Source: http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/Local-Marine-Holds-Vigil-for-Lost-Therapy-Dog-300599241.html#ixzz3Y4TnHC6P